ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) convened on Tuesday to address allegations outlined in a letter by six judges from the Islamabad High Court (IHC), accusing security agencies of interfering in judicial matters. Chaired by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, a six-member bench, including Justices Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Jamal Khan Mandokhaill, Athar Minallah, Musarrat Hilali, and Naeem Akhtar Afghan heard the case.

Chief Justice Isa initiated the session by clarifying that the bench formation committee had determined that all available judges in Islamabad should participate, without selective inclusion.

He highlighted that Justice Afridi had recused himself, and despite previous indications of a full court hearing, it couldn’t be arranged due to the unavailability of two judges.

Acknowledging the polarization within the country, Justice Isa expressed concern that some might prioritize personal viewpoints over judicial independence.

He reiterated the significance of maintaining the judiciary’s autonomy, emphasizing that any form of imposition upon the court constitutes interference, whether internal, external, from intelligence agencies, colleagues, family, or social media.

Regarding the leaked personal details of an IHC judge on social media, Justice Minallah characterized the situation as a serious breach, asserting the state’s responsibility to safeguard judges.

He remarked that the issues raised in the letter reflect longstanding challenges in Pakistan’s judicial system, spanning 76 years.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah raised concerns about both internal and external interference in the judiciary, questioning the extent of privacy in communications amidst potential monitoring.

He urged the SC to address these issues decisively and establish safeguards against interference.

Justice Mandokhel expressed frustration over the challenges faced by SC judges, emphasizing the need for clarity and resolution in the current matter.

He highlighted the Lahore High Court’s reluctance to openly address issues of intervention, despite acknowledging them.

Chief Justice Isa asserted that since assuming office, he hadn’t received any complaints of interference in judicial matters.

He affirmed the court’s commitment to preventing such interference and upholding the integrity of the judiciary.

The letter from IHC judges, including Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiyani, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Baqir Sattar, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, and Justice Salman Rafat Imtiaz, addressed to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), sought guidance on reporting and responding to executive actions, including those from intelligence agencies, that interfere with judicial functions and qualify as intimidation.