Advertisement

Scottish government drops the indyref2 lawsuit

  • Web Desk
  • Share

Scottish government drops the indyref2 lawsuit

Scottish government drops the indyref2 lawsuit

Advertisement
  • The Supreme Court has ruled that the Scottish government cannot hold an independence referendum without the UK government’s approval.
  • First Minister Nicola Sturgeon intends to organize a referendum in October 2019.
  • However, the court decided unanimously that she lacks the authority to do so because Westminster has the last say.
Advertisement

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Scottish government cannot hold an independence referendum without the UK government’s approval.

On October 19, 2019, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon intends to organize a referendum.

However, the court decided unanimously that she lacks the authority to do so because Westminster has the last say on the matter.

The formal approval of a referendum has been rejected by the UK government.

According to Lord Reed, the president of the court, the statutes that established the devolved Scottish Parliament in 1999 meant that it lacked authority over certain provisions of the constitution, such as the union between Scotland and England.

According to him, the UK Parliament is in charge of these matters, hence the Scottish Parliament is unable to pass legislation calling for a referendum in the absence of a deal between the two governments.

Advertisement

Additionally, he dismissed the Scottish government’s claim that any referendum would merely be “advisory” and have no bearing on the union’s formal status, asking people just to express their opinions on whether or not Scotland should become a separate nation.

Lord Reed said: “A lawfully held referendum would have important political consequences relating to the union and the United Kingdom Parliament.

Advertisement

“Its outcome would possess the authority, in a constitution and political culture founded upon democracy, of a democratic expression of the view of the Scottish electorate.

Advertisement

“It is therefore clear that the proposed Bill has more than a loose or consequential connection with the reserved matters of the Union of Scotland and England, and the sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament.”

When asked about the verdict, Ms. Sturgeon expressed disappointment but said she accepted the court’s decision and emphasised that judges only interpret the law, not create it.

That is a difficult pill for any advocate of independence, and most definitely for any fan of democracy, to swallow, she continued.

The first minister stated at a press conference that she still supported a referendum, but in the absence of a deal, the SNP would use the following UK general election as a “de facto referendum” in an effort to show that the majority of people in Scotland support independence.

Advertisement

The “precise detail” of how this would work will now be a matter for the party to debate, she said, with a special conference to be held in the new year.

Advertisement

Ms Sturgeon said: “We must and we will find another democratic, lawful means for Scottish people to express their will” and accused the UK government of “democracy denial”.

Also Read

United Kingdom top court to hear Scottish independence case in October

Scotland's nationalist government wants to hold an independence referendum on October 19,...

Advertisement
Read More News On

Catch all the Business News, Breaking News Event and Latest News Updates on The BOL News


Download The BOL News App to get the Daily News Update & Live News.


Advertisement
End of Story
BOL Stories of the day
Trump leads with 312 electoral votes, Harris trails at 226 in final tally
Trump’s White House comeback puts criminal cases on pause
World leaders congratulate Trump on election win
Here’s how the voting process works in US
Early voting returns may mislead US election results
Now is the time to end Gaza war; says US
Next Article
Exit mobile version