King Charles making a ‘colossal error’ by ignoring Archie & Lilibet?

• Buckingham Palace reportedly invited Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to King Charles’ coronation.
• Some royal specialists and historians have weighed in on the reported palace relocation.
• The King has left his grandchildren, Prince Archie and Princess Lili, out of his coronation plans.

Buckingham Palace reportedly invited Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to King Charles‘ Coronation, but not the couple’s children, Prince Archie Harrison and Princess Lilibet Diana.

Some royal specialists and historians have weighed in on the reported palace relocation, encouraging the King not to exclude Harry and Meghan’s children from the Coronation.

The 74-year-old monarch has been warned that omitting Prince Archie Harrison and Princess Lilibet Diana from the Coronation weekend in May will be a “huge mistake.”

According to Daniela Elser, the Sussex children are not being included in the Coronation plans, most likely due to their young age and their parents’ non-working status within the Firm.

The King has left his grandchildren Prince Archie and Princess Lili out of his coronation plans. And that is a huge mistake,” She wrote about it in a story for News.com.au.

“Reports have suggested that the selection of guests who will fill the Abbey’s pews will be a representative cross-section of a multicultural 21st century Britain. Leaving Archie and Lili out of the whole three-day event makes something of a mockery of all that enthusiastic drum-banging about just how smashing this inclusiveness business is,” Elser said.

“The commentator added that Lilibet and Archie are “completely innocent” when it comes to the feud between the Firm and their parents.”

Also Read

Royal Family yet to make a decision on Prince Harry’s six demands

Prince Harry would attend his father King Charles' coronation if his six...

“By leaving them both out of coronation plans, His Majesty is all but ensuring that the current rift between London and Montecito will only become more deeply entrenched – and that it will last for generations,”  the commentator wrote.