Combat Climate Change with CO2 Removal Technology – Report

• Call for more investment in CO2 removal technology.
• Emission cuts alone won’t stop global warming.
• CO2, mostly from burning fossil fuels, is the main global warming gas.

Leading climate specialists declare in a recent report that technology to remove the greenhouse gas CO2 from our environment must be quickly increased.

Big reductions in CO2 emissions, according to scientists, won’t be sufficient to stop global warming.

And nature won’t be able to clear the air of it sufficiently on her own.

When fossil fuels like gas and oil are burned, they release CO2, which is the main gas warming the earth.

“To limit warming to 2C or lower, we need to accelerate emissions reductions. But the findings of this report are clear: we also need to increase carbon removal too,” says lead author Dr Steve Smith from Oxford University. “Many new methods are emerging with potential.”

Scientists agree that the main cause of global warming is that CO2 emissions, which are expected to total 33 billion tonnes by 2021, are significantly greater than those that are being removed from the atmosphere (this report suggests two billion tonnes a year).

Scientists agree that the main cause of global warming is that CO2 emissions, which are expected to total 33 billion tonnes by 2021, are significantly greater than those that are being removed from the atmosphere (this report suggests two billion tonnes a year).

Global temperatures are expected to increase until emissions and removals are balanced, or “net-zero.”

However, getting there won’t be simple. According to the most recent UN climate assessments, some CO2 removal, often known as “negative emissions,” would be required to fully reach “net zero” in order to make up for industries that are difficult to decarbonize.

Currently, natural processes remove almost all of the CO2 from the atmosphere. That is mostly due to soil-based absorption and storage of CO2 by plants, trees, and other vegetation.

But nature is only capable of so much. How much more of the planet, for instance, can reasonably be devoted to forests? Natural CO2 removal may treble by 2050, according to some pessimistic predictions, but it still only amounts to around 4 billion tonnes of CO2 annually.

Technological solutions?

According to a recent research titled “The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal,” investments in creating technical solutions must be made right away in order to limit and lower future increases in global temperatures.

The cited techniques are all relatively new and at various phases of development and implementation. Together, they now account for a very small portion of global CO2 reduction.

One, called BECCS, involves adding CO2 capture to biomass-based electricity generation, in which organic matter like crops and wood pellets is burned to produce energy. The use of specially treated charcoal (biochar), which locks in carbon, and “enhanced rock weathering,” which is loosely based on the carbon removal that occurs with natural erosion, are additional options. These include large facilities where the carbon is extracted from the air before being stored in the ground.

Technology for removing CO2 is not without its detractors. Some proponents are sceptical about their cost-effectiveness and worry that they will be used as a justification to put off and delay the switch away from fossil fuels.

This research emphasises that reducing CO2 levels should not be considered a “silver bullet” to combat climate change and that in order to reach the UN’s climate goals, both technology and the natural world must work together to lower greenhouse gas levels.

All of that is presuming that global CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels will decline quickly, as promised at numerous climate meetings. Annual emissions have not yet begun to trend downward.

Also Read

“Climate protection is not a crime”, says Greta Thunberg after detention

Environmental activist Greta Thunberg was temporarily detained in German. She has called...