Noor Mukadam Murder Case: Strong Forensic Evidence Collected Against Zahir Jaffer

Noor Mukadam Murder Case: Strong Forensic Evidence Collected Against Zahir Jaffer

Noor Mukadam Murder Case: Strong Forensic Evidence Collected Against Zahir Jaffer

Noor Mukadam Murder Case: Strong Forensic Evidence Collected Against Zahir Jaffer

Advertisement

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad Police on Tuesday issued a statement confirming that “very strong pieces of forensic evidence” are available against Zahir Jaffer, who has been charged with the murder of Noor Mukadam.

According to the statement, the evidence was collected from the crime scene “in a professional manner” and was sent to Punjab Forensic Science Agency.

Advertisement
https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1485904706220269569

The PFSA confirmed the following findings:

1. DNA evidence confirmed that Noor was raped before being killed.

2. Noor made every possible attempt to save her life before being killed. Zahir’s DNA, i.e. skin, was recovered under Noor’s nails.

3. The shirt worn by and recovered from Zahir was stained with Noor’s blood. Her DNA was found on Zahir’s shirt.

4. Noor  was killed with the swiss knife recovered from the crime scene. DNA, i.e. Noor’s blood, was found on the blade and handle of the swiss knife.

Advertisement

5. Noor was also attacked with the knuckle punch recovered from the crime scene. DNA, i.e. Noor’s blood, was found on the knuckle punch.

“These are very strong pieces of forensic evidence and investigation team is committed to seek justice for Noor Mukadam,” the Islamabad Police statement read.

The remark came after a briefing for Inspector General of Police (IGP) Mohammad Ahsan Younus, in which he asked police personnel to describe the case’s progress so far.

DIG Operations, Chief Prosecutor, SSP Investigation, SP Investigation, DSP Legal, and the case’s IO all attended the meeting.

According to the statement, the IGP was informed that the investigation officer had been cross-examined in court the day before and was forced to submit “yes” or “no” responses to queries. The proceedings, however, were misreported in several media sources.

Advertisement

As a result, the statement tried to explain these misconceptions.

Misconceptions

The investigation officer was asked the following questions which he answered with a “no” but which led to erroneous interpretation by the media.

Question: Was the pant of the accused stained with blood?

Answer: No.

Explanation: The pant was not stained with blood , but the shirt of the accused was stained with blood of the victim, Noor Mukadam, as per the PFSA report.

Advertisement

Question: Were there any finger prints found on the knife, the weapon of offence?

Answer: No.

Explanation: The knife recovered from the crime scene was taken into custody, sealed by NFSA and sent to PFSA for fingerprints which could not be developed by the latter. But, the report confirmed Noor Mukadam’s blood on the knife.

Question: Was photogrammetry test conducted for the identification of the victim, Noor Mukadam?

Answer: No.

Explanation: Photogrammetry test is conducted for the identification of the accused so that he could not negate his presence at the crime scene.

Advertisement

PFSA’s detailed report contains ‘sufficient’ evidence for conviction

The statement further said that the detailed report of the PFSA “is yet to be read on the next hearing which contains comprehensive forensic evidence, sufficient for the conviction of the accused”.

“The crime scene was visited by senior most officers at the time of occurrence and scene was completely preserved by forensic experts of National Forensic Science Agency to avoid any contamination,” it added.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Read More News On

Catch all the Pakistan News, Breaking News Event and Latest News Updates on The BOL News


Download The BOL News App to get the Daily News Update & Follow us on Google News.


End of Article

Next Story