Meghan Markle in hot waters, rude behavior at royal tour: Throws tea in air

• Meghan Markle acted “abrasively” toward staff, biographer claims.
• Biographer Tom Bower’s book Revenge will be published next week.
• . All allegations of bullying have been refuted by Meghan’s attorneys.

According to the sensational royal biography that will be published next week, Meghan Markle is accused of acting “abrasively” toward staff members and diplomats.

The Sussex pair allegedly “bombarded their staff with demands for retribution and the removal of the criticism,” according to Tom Bower’s book Revenge: Meghan, Harry, and the conflict between the Windsors.

Meghan Markle has been compared to her well-liked mother-in-law Princess Diana, and the Sussexes have stated that these comparisons are unwarranted.

Also Read

Meghan Markle surprised Palace with her extraordinary brazenness 

A new book says that Meghan Markle's cover showed "unprecedented bravado" that...

However, early exclusive excerpts from the new book that were published before the book’s release the following week suggest the opposite.

The most recent serious charges made by Bower imply that Meghan and Harry encouraged a bullying atmosphere; these claims have been looked into by Buckingham Palace.

According to the biographer’s latest claims, Meghan was “abrasive,” “demanding” of her staff, and “inflamed by the slightest criticism.”

All allegations of bullying made against palace employees or aides have been refuted by Meghan’s attorneys.
Hours before the couple’s bombshell appearance with Oprah Winfrey, in which Meghan accused the Royal Family of “perpetuating falsehoods,” complaints against Meghan surfaced.

After the reports surfaced, the Queen announced an investigation into the allegations of bullying. The investigation was completed in June, but Buckingham Palace withheld the report’s conclusions from the public.

Also Read

Meghan Markle wrote a letter to Hillary Clinton

Meghan Markle said she wrote to Hilary Clinton when she was 11...

Instead, they claimed that the investigation’s suggestions had influenced changes to royal staff regulations and working practices.

Encouragement of open communication among staff members was one of the new initiatives.

According to Richard Fitzwilliams, a royal specialist, Buckingham Palace’s decision to withhold the report from publication may be seen as a “olive branch” to the Sussexes.